ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web Pages.co.uk


Smiley face

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Newquay AWAY by GunnyToday 14:33Today at 14:33:15view thread

Oldest article: Fixtures and Results by Moderator15/6/2019 10:40Sat Jun 15 10:40:55 2019view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Boro v Burton 50/50 Result by boro4421/1 22:38Tue Jan 21 22:38:55 2020view thread

Needham vs Boro

By VS Town (VS Boro)18/1 14:39Sat Jan 18 14:39:12 2020

Views: 1008

Interesting selection.

reply to this article | return to the front page

highlights

By VS Town (VS Boro)19/1 09:21Sun Jan 19 09:21:09 2020In response to Needham vs BoroTop of thread

Views: 546

reply to this article | return to the front page

Results

By VS Town (VS Boro)18/1 17:01Sat Jan 18 17:01:51 2020In response to Needham vs BoroTop of thread

Views: 790

AFC Rushden & Diamonds 4-2 Stratford Town [417]
Alvechurch 0-1 Hednesford Town [223]
Banbury United 0-2 Peterborough Sports [443]
Biggleswade Town P-P Barwell
Coalville Town 1-3 Royston Town [256]
Kings Langley 3-1 Bromsgrove Sporting [369]
Lowestoft Town 6-0 Redditch United [362]
Needham Market 1-3 Nuneaton Borough
Rushall Olympic 2-0 Hitchin Town
Stourbridge 3-1 St Ives Town [712]
Tamworth 1-2 Leiston [651]

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Results

By ntfcadam (nbfcadam)18/1 17:03Sat Jan 18 17:03:54 2020In response to ResultsTop of thread

Views: 777

The wheels on the Tamworth bus going falling off... falling off... falling off!

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Needham vs Boro

By boropod (BoroughPod)18/1 15:16Sat Jan 18 15:16:36 2020In response to Needham vs BoroTop of thread

Views: 869

It is what it is, we'll probaly lose anyway, hope not.

worst forum poster ever

reply to this article | return to the front page

1-0

By Vernon Slain18/1 15:30Sat Jan 18 15:30:21 2020In response to Re: Needham vs BoroTop of thread

Views: 820

Up

From Saint Jimmies's Park.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-0

By Vernon Slain18/1 15:41Sat Jan 18 15:41:37 2020In response to 1-0Top of thread

Views: 808

40 min.

From Saint Jimmies's Park.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 2-0

By ntfcadam (nbfcadam)18/1 15:41Sat Jan 18 15:41:25 2020In response to 1-0Top of thread

Views: 816

2-0
Towers

Edited by nbfcadam at 15:41:38 on 18th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

1-2

By Vernon Slain18/1 15:48Sat Jan 18 15:48:35 2020In response to Re: 2-0Top of thread

Views: 813

1-2 46m

From Saint Jimmies's Park.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1-3

By VS Town (VS Boro)18/1 16:54Sat Jan 18 16:54:31 2020In response to 1-2Top of thread

Views: 835

No text

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By MJNB18/1 17:04Sat Jan 18 17:04:36 2020In response to 1-3Top of thread

Views: 825

Goddard

Good win that

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By joetowny (Joe)18/1 18:02Sat Jan 18 18:02:39 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 729

agreed
well done all.

now lets have a real go, throw the kitchen sink at it
as it stands nothing to lose and all to gain

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By nil desperandum18/1 18:43Sat Jan 18 18:43:10 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 642

Curious look to the league table. Only 10 points between 1st and 11th placed teams. And despite us having a healthy 40 points from 26 games, if teams below pick up reasonable points from their games in hand, our "true" position may be 13th!

Mediocrity abounds I think.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By boropod (BoroughPod)18/1 18:26Sat Jan 18 18:26:18 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 660

Agree, good result.

worst forum poster ever

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By almost average 218/1 18:57Sat Jan 18 18:57:32 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 620

Fair play to Jimmy he mixed things up today with only a very small squad to play with and a very good win at a side who've given some of the better a sides a difficult game this season .

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By stone ragma18/1 19:02Sat Jan 18 19:02:39 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 627

Good result today, think it’s a case of will try and make the play offs with the players we have but won’t be bringing players in to try and get there

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: 1-3

By joetowny (Joe)18/1 19:20Sat Jan 18 19:20:52 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 578

out of curiosity Davey
how do you arrive at that opinion ?
is it a guess or you have been told so

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By stone ragma18/1 19:22Sat Jan 18 19:22:32 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 588

As I have posted below JG said in the paper this week basically going to stick with the players we have left now and stop all the ins and outs

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By joetowny (Joe)18/1 19:28Sat Jan 18 19:28:28 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 598

ok cheers.
at least we might now get some consistency.
far far too many ins and outs.
fwiw i thought it bordered on the farcical

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By Lord of the Manor18/1 19:06Sat Jan 18 19:06:57 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 626

Disagree .... Can see at least a couple of loans coming in.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By stone ragma18/1 19:17Sat Jan 18 19:17:43 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 619

JG said in paper in the week basically going to stick with what we have now

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By Lord of the Manor18/1 20:31Sat Jan 18 20:31:35 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 588

Didn't see that .... But if that's the case either were stopping within budget or no real ambition to make the playoffs

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By Hullablue19/1 09:27Sun Jan 19 09:27:23 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 494

I think we should stick within our budget, which has already been shown to be too ambitious

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm not interested in your opinion" Tommy Wright, after 6-3 defeat at Blyth.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: 1-3

By joetowny (Joe)19/1 10:49Sun Jan 19 10:49:42 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 553

just asking
is there any time scale given to the figures.
some of it does appear to be past history to me
ie HMRC, historical debt etc which must have been settled to continue
also interested parties/investors have been turned away due to not
appealing to the ethos expected / needed ?
if the present budget has been proven too ambitious has it not been cut
which appears to be so looking at the squad and departures
for what period does the 100k shortfall fall into last season / this season ?
as it states its just a generalization of the big picture agreed
its good that we are updated
not knocking it in any way shape or form just commenting on the details given
and when they apply to.
cheers
ps im certain Mark will comment on events

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By mark-nbfc20/1 10:19Mon Jan 20 10:19:10 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 400

Hi Joe, I had to step down from the Co-Op in October due to family/work demands, but im sure that the co-op board can answer any questions.

---
https://youtu.be/Bwk38srACrA

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By joetowny (Joe)20/1 13:52Mon Jan 20 13:52:21 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 320

cheers M no problem
i do know one to speak to
im sure he will put me right . . . . if need be :-)

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By VS Town (VS Boro)19/1 10:57Sun Jan 19 10:57:46 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 455

The £100,000 figure is WOW on two levels.
Amazing a lower than expected attendance figure resulted in a loss of £100,000 (£15/game equates to 300+ missing on the gate).
Amazing that £100,000+ has been recouped by other business activities.

To say "live within budget" is an open statement.
If the playing budget today is the same as August then thats not cutting budget. If its been adjusted to reflect actualities then it has been cut.
Has it been cut? who knows (well some do). Departures indicate it has, but had it been exceeded with the signing of the likes of Breedon & Hood?

My view, is the club have decided to consolidate this season, and start afresh next season.

Edited by VS Boro at 10:59:50 on 19th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By joetowny (Joe)19/1 11:22Sun Jan 19 11:22:50 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 466

thats why i commented on the time scale of events and figures.
how long is the timescale they project does it include the disaster of last season ?
or from when ? to ??
now !
to lose 100k in half a season is mind blowing
so would expect a lot of the debt to have been in place pre season
think there was some comment made last season about the debt inherited / or unknown
again not knocking, just surmising.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By VS Town (VS Boro)19/1 11:33Sun Jan 19 11:33:49 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 411

I am guessing/hoping the £100,000 is a projected figure.

It's easy to extrapolate any figures like this, but its a complex matter.
I wonder what new debts arose? (guessing) but if books were not kept in check (and thats an easy assumption to make) then creditors will creep out of the wood work.

Didn't Neale/Thorn/Smurfwait/Hawkins/Ginnelly (maybe) say the debts were worse than expected :)


NO PROBLEM, but I suspect this season has been written off - Just tread water and start afresh next season (with less optimistic gate figures).

Even taking out inherited debt, it does point to how much it costs at this level (how do other clubs manage?) unless boro budget is/was massive in comparison to most.

Edited by VS Boro at 11:33:57 on 19th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By MJNB19/1 10:14Sun Jan 19 10:14:45 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 446

+1.

A bit of stability may actually improve performances and results too

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By stone ragma19/1 09:30Sun Jan 19 09:30:07 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 508

Agreed

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By Lord of the Manor19/1 10:10Sun Jan 19 10:10:04 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 445

agreed ....but... do we know we are?.... is there any room for maneuver, free loans etc

just asking .

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By MJNB19/1 10:15Sun Jan 19 10:15:26 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 419

Also agree with that, some loans are cost free and worth exploring if the player will provide that extra spark

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By stone ragma18/1 20:35Sat Jan 18 20:35:56 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 620

Have you read the Co-op /club statement?

Edited by stone ragma at 20:36:31 on 18th January 2020

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: 1-3

By Lord of the Manor18/1 20:52Sat Jan 18 20:52:13 2020In response to Re: 1-3Top of thread

Views: 649

No ....

reply to this article | return to the front page

Previous thread: Off topic - Kings Lynn Town by MJNB19/1 10:17Sun Jan 19 10:17:01 2020view thread


The forum or any messages are not and should not be interpreted as an official announcement from Nuneaton Borough FC or anyone associated with Nuneaton Borough FC. Nuneaton Borough FC will not accept responsibility for any messages posted in the forum. Please refrain from bad language.