Return to front page

Newest article: ๐ƒ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ฎ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ค๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ… by mark-nbfcYesterday 08:08Yesterday at 08:08:01view thread

Oldest article: 6 months till new season by 2B/5E18/1 18:31Thu Jan 18 18:31:20 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Off topic- cricket - Warwickshire by MJNB31/1 12:13Wed Jan 31 12:13:58 2024view thread

By association

By ManorParkBlue31/1 11:51Wed Jan 31 11:51:26 2024

Views: 504

Iโ€™ve seen a fair few comments such as โ€œif the previous people are involvedโ€ฆ.im outโ€ Etc etc. or words to those effect.

How โ€œinvolvedโ€ are we going?

The secretary?
The sponsors?
The bar manager?
Jimmy as Chairman of the new club?

Iโ€™m intrigued

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Is it the right timeโ€ฆ..

By VS Griff (VS Boro)31/1 14:44Wed Jan 31 14:44:42 2024In response to By associationTop of thread

Views: 389

For the true (at least headline) extent of the debt to be known.

Itโ€™s not going to hurt Boro Leisure and (given its reported on CH) the club must know (whatever โ€œthe clubโ€ means)

Has losing the ground in 2023 only accelerated the inevitable ?

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

Edited by VS Boro at 14:45:42 on 31st January 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Is it the right timeโ€ฆ..

By VS Griff (VS Boro)31/1 14:43Wed Jan 31 14:43:08 2024In response to By associationTop of thread

Views: 362

No text

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: By association

By stripes4me31/1 14:19Wed Jan 31 14:19:47 2024In response to By associationTop of thread

Views: 388

Bit of an eye opener to see plenty of accusations/inferences in the 'Meeting' thread laying the blame at other people's door not just Jimmys.

If the comments can be taken at face value they seem to be from someone well connected with the Nuns / AT.

Hard to see how anyone who had influence over financial matters in the old regime can fully escape criticism for where we are today.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: By association

By VS (VS Boro)31/1 14:39Wed Jan 31 14:39:46 2024In response to Re: By associationTop of thread

Views: 395

My view of the actual meeting was that there was no specific "mud slinging", just generic one referencing the last 30 years or so.

Generally I thought those with connections to Boro Leisure were guarded what they said.

WRT Boro Leisure.
The buck stops at the top. If people were delegated to pay bills and didn't that should have been picked up (at least as soon as demand came in). In all business (particularly small) invoices can be "mislaid". If negligence then should be removed of that responsibility and those in control implement.

There is clearly very important costs to be met (Tax, energy, players and rent).
It's pretty clear that the weekly rent was no more than a squad players wages. Did the person in overall control make sure the playing budget was set to reflect other costs and this was adhered to?

The running of the club was unusual (even more so now).
As of may 2023 (before DA Capital and LockGate) there were
2 shareholder (JG-60% and SustainYourSport-40%)
1 Director.

Shareholders appoint directors to legally run the business.
Why was there only one director when others were clearly involved?
Jason Dean has been mentioned in this thread. I suspect his role was just "by name" rather than having any legal responsibly.

I believe the sponsors could (and did) offer recommendations to the directors. It's up to directors to list and act (or not).
The only "power" the sponsors had was to withdraw any financial help......but did they want that (in retrospect it made no difference).

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

Edited by VS Boro at 14:40:47 on 31st January 2024
Edited by VS Boro at 14:41:14 on 31st January 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: By association

By stripes4me31/1 15:11Wed Jan 31 15:11:07 2024In response to Re: By associationTop of thread

Views: 380

Just to clarify I meant comments in the 'Meeting ' thread on this forum NOT Co-op meeting the other night.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: By association

By Wotnostrikers31/1 12:34Wed Jan 31 12:34:08 2024In response to By associationTop of thread

Views: 457

They can all go along as supporters

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: By association

By Vernon231/1 13:29Wed Jan 31 13:29:24 2024In response to Re: By associationTop of thread

Views: 424

I am absolutely sure of that. Then there is the siting of the statue to be sorted.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Previous thread: Have we considered setting up our new club as a franchise by VoR31/1 07:52Wed Jan 31 07:52:57 2024view thread