Newest article: Gary Holliday by GustavusYesterday 21:02Yesterday at 21:02:09view thread
Oldest article: Free admission at Solihull by Dougie830/1 18:37Tue Jan 30 18:37:40 2024view thread
Next thread: EasyFundRaising by Anonymous12/3 16:46Tue Mar 12 16:46:46 2024view thread
Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1711
CLUB NAME
In the last 24 hours, we have had confirmation from Birmingham County FA that they have not approved the name Nuneaton FC, which was voted for by 55% of fans who took part in the online poll. They have indicated that the other option of Nuneaton Town FC is acceptable, and this has now gone to the relevant FA committee for final approval. Based on our research we did not anticipate having a problem with the name Nuneaton FC but respect the decision of the game's governing body.
------------------------------------------------------
Boro Exile
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1282
Nuneatonbrough F.C.
Works for Middlesboro'......
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1576
Any explanation for rejecting Nuneaton FC? Seems a bit arbitrary.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1400
I would guess that the decision is based on the intention of the new custodians to link with the past entities.
Nuneaton Borough FC is dead—Killed by incompetence.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1540
None as of yet, as far as I am aware.
Agree about the arbitrariness of it.
---
Hope is not a plan.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1453
AFC Nuneaton may had done the trick. Did anyone submit it perchance ?
We were warned,but did it anyway.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1158
No
Note to self, 'be careful what you wish for'
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1404
Strange - Nuneaton FC would distance itself from previous cock ups more than AFC Nuneaton or Nuneaton Town.
Personally I would like to have something unique - Perhaps Nuneaton 2024.
Makes little difference to me. People will still refer to it as "the Boro".
Same with badge - Personally something modern with no link to past club.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1314
Don't worry...... in a few years it will become Nuneaton and Bedworth Town FC
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1279
More chance of finding rocking horse - - - -.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1166
I know I say it (half)in jest but if in two or three years time we can't find a ground to play on within the Boro of Nuneaton then a merger must be on the cards
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1061
We’ve been told we are at Bedworth for two seasons , with an option of another season ,what do you think that means.? bearing in mind it takes a long time to get everything in motion and in place to get a new stadium built.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1143
I think it's gonna take a lot longer than 3 years with a pot of money we ain't got to get a new ground within the Boro of Nuneaton .....council willing aswell .....
Half of me just thinks that after playing at Beduff for three seasons then with no new ground insight the sensible thing would be a merger ......
Tell me I was wrong in 3 or so years time.
Edited by Lord of the Manor at 11:22:11 on 8th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1001
I will do.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1129
I can categorically say I wouldn't be working on this project if I thought that would be the outcome!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 939
I should hope not, who the hell would be going to Bedworth to watch B&N United
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1031
Wouldn't say it would or even could be the outcome but it's a possibility when in three years time we're in no position to have a ground of our own ......
It's taken the council about 5 years to open a bridge....
How's many years is it going to take the council to give us some land to build a stadium on with all the infrastructure that would have to come with it ??????
Plus where is all the money coming from to make this happen????
Edit..... We either find a very rich benifactur ( which no one wants ) or merg ....
Edited by Lord of the Manor at 12:47:39 on 8th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 843
What would Bedworth gain from a merger with their tenant?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 869
Bigger home gates .... More money on merchandise.....behind the bar .....food....50/50... Etc etc
Basically financially better off, probably a better chance of promotion.
That goes for both teams...
This wouldn't go down well with both sets of fans but if run properly would benefit both clubs
Edited by Lord of the Manor at 20:07:21 on 9th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 717
They would already have rent from us as tenants and all the bar take from our matches as well as theirs. I'm not sure that losing those additional matchdays with their revenue streams to merge with a club who may be below them in the pyramid would benefit them in any way at all.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 694
I would say the THEORY is such
Suppose both clubs bring in revenue of £100 to spend on players.
Merging the two would bring in £150 to spend on players.
More money on played should (but as we know it’s not guaranteed) bring in better results.
Very much simplified but that’s the theory.
Whilst having two grounds should bring in more money via sponsorship the maintenance is also higher.
I doubt anyone would favour a merger, but does it make sense having two competing clubs just 3.5 miles apart? But when has logic and football ever gone together?
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 944
😂
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 848
we'd all like us back at LW.....
if not we'd all like the council to give us a prime site within the town ....
If not inside maybe outside of town ...
If not maybe a long term ground share....
If not ....what then 🤔
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 764
LW will always be pursued but even now AT are refusing to entertain to idea of the ground leased or even sold.
If things change, then thats another matter, but my personal opinion is that Nuneaton Town must return to Nuneaton in a location with the urban area and not in an "out of town" location, as that goes against the principle of "competitive sustainability" that will be front and centre of the clubs ethos.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 758
So a "solution" l
like Leamington, which is between 4 and 5 miles from Leamington centre will be rejected?
like Kettering Town, which is between 3 and 4 mikes from Kettering will be rejected?
The Oval to Nuneaton is between 3 and 4 miles.
Liberty Way is between 1 and 2 miles.
Even where the women play is 2 miles away, and (happy to corrected) the acadamy is 8 miles away.
How far "out of town" will be acceptable?
I 100% accept EVERY SITUATION IS UNIQUE. I am struggling to think of any potential areas within Nuneaton., not withstanding the cost to buy the land and then build facilities. Perhaps cuckooing (not in the legal sense) may be an option.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
Edited by VS Boro at 09:55:03 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 741
Liberty Way is no longer an out of town location, not with all the thousands of house being built that side of Nuneaton.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 823
It doesn’t help that false claims continue to be posted on Boro Chat.
The arrears would not have been paid off imminently. 14k was owed,
The Club was formally notified on 5th September that it needed to pay the arrears in full by 15 September.
Relief from forfeiture could not have been obtained from the Court because there were multiple breaches of the lease which had occurred over a number of years.
If there ever will be a return to LW then trust will need to rebuilt through adult behaviour. Those making outlandish claims on Boro Chat aren’t helping that!
Edited by Gustavus at 09:37:52 on 10th March 2024
Edited by Gustavus at 09:39:03 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 730
I have been told that the landlord could not have taken the action that he took if the remaining length of the lease dipped below 3 years. Another ingredient into the soup.
Nuneaton Borough FC is dead—Killed by incompetence.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 814
I understand re entry could occur any time there was not full payment within 21 days so they were generous to let it go in for as long as they did!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 666
Hi
I have concerns how you know so much info plus more than what the football club received?? because I can assure you after the new board been informed about the arrears this was followed with a meeting AT representative and all that was said bring the rent up to date and all will be fine … no letters where sent at all and no mention of any repossession … so I would be really grateful for you to share this information so we can investigate as the club have a lot of interested sponsors
Thanks
Edited by Cookie1966 at 21:46:23 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 817
Can you help those of us that have personal items inside get them back?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 816
I have heard (and I believe it) that once the threat was made, the club offered to pay back the arrears by end-of 2025 (30 months). Only after lockout was 2023 proposed (or even immediately) AND I have no recollection of anyone at the club saying this (2025) as 2023 makes AT sound unreasonable.
I don't deny I have no idea of the motives for what AT have ultimately done; I does not make sense to me, particularly after the 2nd offer.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
Edited by VS Boro at 10:03:46 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 868
That’s correct and was rejected and full payment required.
A further formal email of 20th September repeated this.
Boro were told landlord would take repossession.
As for the point you’ve added I think they lost any faith in the reliability of the tenant which is why any future talks should be done by fresh faces!
Edited by Gustavus at 10:16:24 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 706
Hi Gustavus, is there any indication as to who they would not be willing to talk to. Would they talk to the Supporters Co-operative committee for example. Is anybody connected with the previous regime able to talk with AT or not? Any clarification would help, thanks.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 612
I think based from Gustavus comments about “continual” comments. It seems that Ian Cook is probably chatting rubbish in Gustavus’ / NR’s eyes.
So your answer is in the above.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 475
With respect rather than us second guess I would rather Gustavus answer my question, thanks.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 788
Talks was held with fresh faces and this was rejected … we sponsor are very happy to have a discuss face to face about this situation ??? so please let me know when suits you so I can speak to the sponsors to attend also I would like to see any additional correspondence sent to boro leisure this will help to understand the whole situation
Thanks
Edited by Cookie1966 at 22:08:38 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 827
Was that via a Section 146 notice? Everyone I spoke to at the club has claimed one was not recieved (that doesn't include JG btw).
And if a Section 146 notice wasn't served, then the forfeiture reversal would be a formality.
If one was served, and wasn't acted on, then the Boro Leisure deserved what it got.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 756
"Everyone I spoke to at the club". These the same people who constantly claim 5000+ were at the play off final?
Have you spoke to AT?
There are 2 sides to every story. Sadly one is not giving there's.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
Edited by VS Boro at 09:56:40 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 754
S146 wasn’t needed because of the terms of the lease.
The Barack room lawyer on Boro Chat doesn’t understand this
.
Formal notice was sent by email to SE.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 742
Why SE?
Was there any proof the email was received?
There are lots of rumours that this was not just about rent.
Until AT or Boro Leisure actually say anything publicly about the reasons, we will be left with people who have been briefed by one interested party or another spilling what and when suits their agenda.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 720
Because he was chairman
The previous two emails went to the lady doing the accounts
And although it could have been for sub letting or the condition of the buildings it was specifically about the rent!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 672
Did the chairman reply? If so, what did the chairman say?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 691
The email was ignored.
He was also at a meeting where he was told it needed to be paid.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 682
Was the owner aware of the seriousness of the situation, to your knowledge?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 671
Yes
And you could say he was responsible for the arrears in first place as they went back at least four years.
Another poster has said on here they mistook kindness for weakness!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 635
Was the chairman, vice chairman and those other decision makers aware of the seriousness of the situation, to your knowledge?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 677
Were those people decision makers?
Did they, for example, have the power to sack the manager?
Were they advising and the owner deciding, or would the owner have to suck it up of the chairman and vice chairman made a decision he didn't agree with?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 644
There were chances to remove the manager , at least 2 times there were votes of confidence.
Manager/owner would have walked if he didn't have the backing... but those who funded the Club are the same people who helped with decisions and chose to carry on regardless.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 631
Would he have walked as owner if he was sacked as manager?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 645
Good question.. if the people who paid his wages had chose to stop doing so we might have had the answer .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 694
From what JG said repeatedly, he brought the sponsors in, they were his friends and contacts.
And he was the owner.
He made the decisions, he signed the cheques.
Seems a very odd way of running a company to be honest.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 671
JG said himself that at any other club (where the manager was not the owner) he would have been sacked.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 637
I think he was right
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 658
I don’t know if they were decision makers but yes they were aware.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 612
Are Cook and Eliot involved in Nuneaton Town v3 please.
Note to self, 'be careful what you wish for'
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 609
SE is I think
Also - I think it’s V5
* the original
* one after WW2
* StadiaSafe
* Boro Leisure
* 2024
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 650
When did Dean step down as chair?
When did SE become chair?
Not saying either a fault as that is clearly owner / directors, but the non payment of rent was over years and not months.
Seems to me SE picked up a poisoned chalice and could only advise.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 661
I think that’s fair comment
It’s the lies after lockout which is galling though and they are still carrying on on Boro Chat.
It’s v annoying that nobody has taken responsibility at any stage since this sorry mess started.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 666
Absolute situation where the 'acting' chairman, Jason Dean failed in his duties. Due diligence then failed BL when the company demoted Jason Dean to bar person, they did not oversee his emails. This then averted any continuous process with AT.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 665
Oh I know that.
I was just curious to see how much you'd spill.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 742
Agreee with that. Will the truth ever come out ?
Nuneaton Borough FC is dead—Killed by incompetence.
Edited by Vernon Slain at 11:42:13 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 963
As for the money, grants.
As a not for profit commu ity thing, there are lots and lots of grants out there.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1016
Forums moved on from not being able to say anything that’s not pro JG, to not being able to think the co-op/fan run/collab thing will not necessarily be a success.
For what it’s worth, I agree with you LoTM. For all the good intentions of the steering committee etc, and I appreciate their efforts, without significant investment into the ground/council help/etc I too think this will be the beginning of the merger.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 874
I agree
Without money to build a ground (if land could be found) OR being tenants of a private enterprise then I can’t see a move back to Nuneaton ( I can think of one location but can’t see the owners be bitten twice).
Taking away understandable biases - merged team makes sense.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 923
It all depends on how you define it being a succees I guess.
Some want it to progress on and off the pitch (Champions League here they come) to others just wanting g it to get a ground in Nuneaton.
There is lots of criticism already, especially on Boro Chat, bit I feel most cones from a place where they do not know pr understand how it will work and people being u happy that it will not work as they want it to.
I hope the co-op (as they are the only element talking to fans right now) are able to head off lots of this at the next meeting.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 913
They need to tell fans how it's going to work and who's involved .
Fans will give the club a lot of lea way if they feel there being told the truth . I know something but your not important enough to know ain't going to work .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 901
Be intresting to see how open those in charge of the club will be
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 872
Thinking in terms of openness, how far would measures such as the sharing of the club finances on a monthly basis help?
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 877
It would help tremendously but would probably be very scary
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 879
It's a brave new world 😊
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 902
I hope this happens at the next meeting.
At the minute, to me, it is coming across as "the volunteers are doing g lots of work and do not want to jeopardise anything by announcing it u til it is conformed", but I can see why others will see it other ways.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 880
+1 .....
I see it the same but some things must remain private and kept behind closed doors.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 909
Totally agree and I hope that over time people will come to appreciate how things have and are going to work. The meeting on Wednesday will explain some of this stuff and there will be info shared for those who cannot attend too.
" I know something but your not important enough to know ain't going to work"
Totally agree, we've had quite enough of that.
What I would say though is, there has to be a degree of confidentiality especially until things have been confirmed otherwise people end up announcing things that haven't happened and then don't end up happening, which is also wrong. I suppose I mean that there is a difference between confidentiality and secrecy.
---
Hope is not a plan.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 940
Can fully understand that .
One of my biggest problems with how the club was run under Jimmy was we were only told what he felt we needed to know yet information was leaked out to his friends who then leacked it out further , so everything was rumour and hearsay . To be honest I feel the co-op have also been guilty of this in the past with people involved for their own ego reasons .
Honesty & transparency obviously within reason has got to be the way forward .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 905
His version of events were leaked to his mates.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1400
That will be the definitive end of the Boro
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Club name not approved - from co op
Views: 1230
The rights to use Nuneaton FC are owned by somebody else perhaps
reply to this article | return to the front page
Definitively NOT the end of The Boro
Views: 1425
They will always be The Boro' to me and The Politburo will not make me change my mind.
After much pressure (by me-I have the correspondence), they claimed that they had not enforced the previous migration from Boro to Town suggesting strongly that it was an in house decision. I did not believe them then. I do not believe their motives are honourable now. They are a horrible Dads Army organisation. I've had other dealings with them in the past,when representing players from other clubs. Stubborn, intransigent jobsworths.
Do your worse BCFA-I will continue to follow the Boro' I have dozens of Town and Boro shirts so no skin off my nose.
However : I have made my views on Real Donnithorne clear to all. It makes about as much sense as this .
Edited by Bedduth Blue at 20:21:41 on 6th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Definitively NOT the end of The Boro
Views: 1228
My theory is that ‘Nuneaton FC’ (which could be interpreted as meaning the principal football club in Nuneaton) is seen as being too pushy, given that an established club in the same town - Nuneaton Griff - would probably be in a higher league initially. As a comparison, Hereford FC was acceptable because the other two well-established non-league clubs in the city are Westfields and Pegasus, so no confusion arises (in the simple minds of regional FA blazers). Just a theory, mind….
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Definitively NOT the end of The Boro
Views: 1296
I may be wrong, but I seem to recall, again perhaps incorrectly, that this was suggested when the Borough was last liquidated and we became Nuneaton Town.
The reason then was perhaps the same as now.
Nuneaton F.C. are Nuneaton rugby club.
You will know that at the time when the codes were being written for both sports that many clubs were undecided as to where they were going in terms of rules.
Thus Leicester Football Club is, in fact, the Tigers - the rugby club. Leicester Fosse became Leicester City.
Perhaps someone will confirm or deny this.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Definitively NOT the end of The Boro
Views: 1290
The Nuns are Nuneaton RFC, according to the signs on Eastborough Way
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Leroy Lita by s. tone ragma711/3 20:23Mon Mar 11 20:23:08 2024view thread