Newest article: James Harrison by ntfcadamToday 11:47Today at 11:47:42view thread
Oldest article: Today's Line Up by CockandBear7/3 14:22Sat Mar 7 14:22:38 2026view thread
Next thread: Barwell away. by Dougie 814/9 19:45Mon Sep 14 19:45:53 2026view thread
Match Thread
Views: 1289
https://www.facebook.com/share/1JadJeHBYZ/
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 606
I was not at the game yesterday but what I have seen this season is we have not got a good centre forward, someone who can hold the ball up and win the crosses in the air,when we get the ball up to the front it is just coming straight back and catching us out,teams are getting behind our defence will anybody know who we can get ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 776
I wonder who will do the post match interview 🤔
reply to this article | return to the front page
Interview with Doddsy
Views: 801
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1d54LegCf2/
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 774
Should give it to Bert's dad if they want an honest evaluation.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 730
Are we a stronger side do you think than last years squad ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 611
Generally, the new players are of a higher standard, from what I have seen, ie- two home games. This would suggest that the squad itself is better. Unfortunately this is nulified by the fact that the majority of teams we now face are of a much higher standard too.
Mistakes at this level are more readily punished than in the league we just came from. We have just about rebuilt a whole new team who have yet to gel into an effective unit. This will come with experience,and with more playing time together. The managers, I'm sure, have a prefered style of play, and should be getting an idea of their best starting eleven to suit this. Swapping and changing line ups is counter productive as you cannot create effective units either in defence, or attack. Pick your best eleven and stick with it.
Like I posted yesterday; the Matlock game was a harsh lesson in what we will be facing this season. Get a solid defensive unit together. That is the priority, get that right then the results will follow.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 655
From an attacking point of view yes , but i think he would have struggled defensively at this level he struggled against better step 5 teams .
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 712
There were plenty of others there. My first game this season. Will be down for a Saturday home game soon.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 764
Russ. I'll edit it and put it out on the way back if there's enough signal
---
Hope is not a plan.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 754
Thanks Mark ....
I didn't go so cant comment but it sounds like its one of them games where the managers need to put there hands up and say sorry " we got it wrong today "
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 743
If you are facing a striker with the class of Conor Washington playing at this level, then it doesn't matter how you prepare for the game you are going to be up against it!
The Matlock X site said that the Boro's centre-half didn't know how to handle him!
It would be very interesting to know how much he is being paid?
We know how that plays out because we have had top class strikers before & our opponents have suffered.
If we are going to rely on the County leagues/Sunday leagues to provide players & management at this level, then it could be a struggle to stay in this league.
It would also be interesting to know what Rich Lavery is doing at the moment?
Edited by VoR at 19:31:49 on 12th September 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 686
A lot of the Matlock team are at Town’s level - they also made mistakes. First goal keeper should have saved, build up to pen our defender fell over. Too often their players were unmarked.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 663
Not helped by having a stand in centre half.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 697
I have said it before, and will say it again. We need to get our defence sorted out. We could have scored four today but still have lost. From what those who were there have posted, their nine and ten, were the main difference between the two sides, but as Dodds has said, two players should never make that much difference. If a team has someone like a Culpin, then you need to prevent them getting the service they need. This level is a big step up from what we have had over the last two seasons. Matlock will not be the best side we play this season, as there are well established teams . Today should be a lesson, to both players ,and management; which if not learned, then we will have to get used to results like todays.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 695
Their 10 spent most of the game falling over and screaming. The ref didn’t give him a single foul and booked him for kicking a ball into the stand.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 688
And supporters will lose patience if results like that carry on
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 760
I don't think expectations should be too high this season.
Avoiding relegation & the group gaining valuable experience playing at this level should be the priority.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 594
I don't always (often?) agree with you, VoR, but I'm with you on this one. Mid table mediocrity is acceptable for this season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 600
Avoid relegation.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 756
"checks watch."
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1112
1-1 soft goal keeper should have done better
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1063
2-1 down defence is dreadful
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1032
Soft pen to Matlock 3-1 we are way out of our depth. Embarrassing
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 971
Matlock currently 4th in their league so perhaps I am doing them a disservice. Boro have serious problems
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 923
Looks like 4 subs coming on.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 907
lol won’t make a difference will it
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 932
We did not play well at all first half. No getting away from it.
Matlock are managerless but have a 7.5k a week budget according to their chairman, so have some decent players and also brought some players in during the week.
---
Hope is not a plan.
Edited by mark-nbfc at 16:01:04 on 12th September 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 964
Managerless seems to beat clueless.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 972
Very true. We had plenty of possession first half but they capitalised well on defensive errors.
---
Hope is not a plan.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 969
We could do with their number 9
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 844
No we need to be effing arsed
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 893
Better performance second half but no real chances
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 873
Could well be that they had already won the game by half time. If not then you would have to ask why we did'nt start with the four that came on at half time.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 830
Their number 9 was the difference
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 810
🥱 getting sick of this
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 984
If anyone thinks they can get back into this give ur head a massive wobble
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 912
Really surprised you mentioned the budget there Mark, it must be really bad today.
Note to self, 'be careful what you wish for'
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 969
Ooooooo
Read my first sentence.
* It would be better if I could type. Will amend my first sentence 😅
I also only mentioned it because berts-dad referred to their team
---
Hope is not a plan.
Edited by mark-nbfc at 16:00:51 on 12th September 2026
Edited by mark-nbfc at 16:02:47 on 12th September 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 886
Pathetic go a goal up then collapse I’m sorry this is getting into a same pattern it’s not on
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 920
Roll on Tuesday, oh right, I'll get me coat.
Note to self, 'be careful what you wish for'
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 980
No text
Edited by boro44 at 15:48:12 on 12th September 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 953
We should ...
but devils advocate would say weve signed better players to compete in this league.
Just saying 😌
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 940
Goalie and full backs look very suspect. No defensive midfield. Being outplayed in every position.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 979
4-1 down it’s way too easy for Matlock. We got rid of the wrong keeper.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1041
Jimmy was quick to drop him at Barwell too.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Not entirely unexpected
Views: 917
We don't do the Trophy. Never have. Never will. Especially anywhere north of Higham Lane.
Must admit it looked a strange starting line up. Almost as if we were resting a few, with a view to the six pointer at The Oval on Tuesday.
Lol.
As for reaching levels and then struggling..well playing squad issues aside..Hmm.
Early doors I suppose.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 847
I think the managers want to please everyone ( players ) they all get game time so they all get paid.
Players need to realise once they get the shirt they need to keep it .... it isn't a given that you will play.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 821
Correct. Find your best eleven then stick to it.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 811
Should maybe try the shape we had early pre season, i think 5 at the back?
Osborn
Green Shilton Roberts Softley Chesterton
Armson Jones
Elliot
Sawyers Stretton
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 776
Five at the back for a start, with two holding midfielders which we seriously lack.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 706
In the first half it looked like we had 3 at the back and all our problems came from attacks down the wing.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 789
How’s that gonna change things
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 800
How do u react to that then stockingford blue I’m angry annoyed fuming I can accept losing but losing like that being timid is not on
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 719
Why do you think they were timid? Back four looked experimental and shaky. It was too easy to catch us on the break. Their number 9 was a different class.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 728
Conor Washington, age 34.
An impressive career in the Football League.
43 appearances for Northern Ireland, scoring 6 goals.
Scored 25 goals in 39 appearances for Matlock last season.
Edited by VoR at 17:59:17 on 12th September 2026
Edited by VoR at 17:59:36 on 12th September 2026
Edited by VoR at 18:00:01 on 12th September 2026
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 684
He was outstanding we couldn't cope with him at all . They had some really good players there 6 & 11 also looked really good players at this level . We were poor all over the pitch and i'm struggling to think of anyone who had a good game .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 582
we have stepped up twice from shall we say next to amateur pub football.
to basement semi pro football
its going to get a whole lot tougher for sure.
only the club, the management know our limit.
finances dictate in any pro sport or indeed semi pro.
not knocking that just stating the basic facts.
bottom line..... if it was not for the people running the club now there would be NO CLUB.
end of.
ps. if your talking semi pro football ?
you need £££££ backers
you might not like or want to see that again.... going on our past history.
sorry..... there is no alternative.
if you know of one im all ears.
UTB.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 550
I don't like arguing with you JT and I rarely do. But I played lots of Sunday and Saturday League football. " Next to Amateur Pub Football" is definitely not what I watched over the last two promotion seasons.
Any one of our opponents from those two seasons would have massacred each of the various teams I played for. The Boro squad-any formation-would have reached double figures against them. Trust me.
I hear what you say about a rebuild. But players like Sawyers and Harrison and a few others (Jimmy when fit) MUST be retained. And PLAYED.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 575
no problem sauce if you dont agree
debate is the cornerstone of opinions.
im far far from mr perfect :-) cough !!
i dont get these days so i rely on posters for the news thoughts etc etc.
thats why i talk in general terms on the club
same sentiments go to the Pieman
infact that goes for all..... absolutely no problem on my part.
i enjoy debate differing viewpoints etc etc
cheers
UTB
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 570
As always, Joe talks a lot of sense.
Some of the comments about the team and management are a bit over the top given the restrictions we have as a newly formed club playing within our budget. I believe that this group of players do always give their best and will improve with time as they get to know each other. There are not going to be any easy games in this league, and Tuesdays' match looks to be tougher than most. The best way to get the team to settle into this league is to get behind them.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 565
To be fair i think most fans are aware of the situation and do give the players great support every game as they did yesterday , but its hard when your 4-1 down at HT . Even then there was no great criticism we just went a bit quiet .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 646
I Should think it was a realisation of the task facing us this season. Over the last two seasons we have got used to being the dominant team, and putting our opponents to the sword.
With a bit of hard work, and organisation we can turn it around. It will get better, but we need to manage expectations.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 634
The subs played well. The back four were just over powered. They were not as strong physically, slower and punished for every mistake they made. They will get better with more experience. We have yet to make any weak sides except, perhaps, Coalville.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 735
Being caught on the break is a regular occurance.
Been saying about our defence all season, pre season and last season. Nothing has changed, we are tactically naive no plan B and thats due to managers who are out of their depth. I'm really worried we will get destroyed on Tue if we keep this up.
Note to self, 'be careful what you wish for'
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 718
Didnt go today but we're a different side when Essa dosnt play...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 787
I was not at the game so relied on posts from those that did attend. I never thought that Matlock was going to be an easy game, as they are well established at this level, whereas we need to adapt.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 810
They need to realise actually try ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 842
What really yes I’d accept losing but actually not trying that isn’t acceptable
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Not entirely unexpected
Views: 773
They definitely tried but got punished for basic mistakes at the back. Matlock looked a physically stronger side but were not dirty.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Brandon bache has left the club by Snappycroc UTT9/9 19:42Wed Sep 9 19:42:34 2026view thread