Newest article: Re: April 200 Club draw result by Unnamed Sauce8/5 19:41Wed May 8 19:41:11 2024view thread
Oldest article: Cam McWilliams by MJNB8/1 21:11Mon Jan 8 21:11:02 2024view thread
Next thread: Leroy Lita by s. tone ragma711/3 20:23Mon Mar 11 20:23:08 2024view thread
FAO danborofc
Views: 679
danborofc said:-
'Can you help those of us that have personal items inside get them back?'
I don't think that you should be posting on this Forum as if you are a victim of what happened.
I don't really want to enter into a conversation with you, as you will be economical with the truth.
I worked in Drawing Offices for 35 years. I would never have left personal items (that could not be replaced) at my place of work under any circumstances - it's unprofessional.
It's far more likely that you want to retrieve documents that show how you and your Company were complicit in killing the FC that I have supported for 50 years.
Anyone that is stupid enough to leave irreplaceable personal items at their place of work does not deserve to have them back.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 419
I've got some personal items in the club that I'd like back.. I've never worked for the club.
In your 35 years of experience of working in a drawing office is there any chance you could help? Like Dan asked for help?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 355
I would hope you and those that have pictures memobilia flags etc are given access to claim items not owned by Boro leisure. The land owners have no right to keep these items. Its a civil law matter unfortunatley.
Note to self, 'be careful what you wish for'
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 358
I believe only a few flags remain - as of four weeks ago.
The sensitive issue is the memorial garden.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 366
I do not believe that the contents of the social club,offices and snack bar etc would become the property of the landlord even in these circumstances.
Nuneaton Borough FC is dead—Killed by incompetence.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 527
What a bloody stupid thing to say Bo
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 518
Here's another stupid thing to say Davey while I'm on a roll.
If the Sponsor that paid for Dan's services had used that money to pay the rent on LW, then you would still have a Football Club to watch every week during the Season!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 411
Why should a sponsor be paying anything beyond sponsorship money?
The owner us the kne who should have been deciding what money was spent on.
And the rent not being paid is not the only reason Boro got booted.
I am amazed how many Boro fans are happy to blame a sponsor rather than the owners.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
Edited by The_Hullablue at 17:56:06 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 399
Still amazed that people think that the whole shit show is down to one man 😂
I appreciate it's the best and easiest option to do ...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 394
There was one owner.
One person in charge.
That is why people think one person is to blame.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
Edited by The_Hullablue at 19:20:43 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 361
So, who else was to blame?
Does the buck not stop with the owner?
Surely every decision was approved by him, either directly or he took the decision to devolve that decision making.
Who else is to blame then?
And why?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 488
Not convinced.
You would like to think so, but I suspect it would have gone on players.
I think JG claimed his wages were paid by an other.
Add to this the surplus over Covid, the villa and Rushall games, the sponsorship brought in and the fact the rent was probably equivalent to a bench players wages YET the rent was still not paid.
>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 475
If we had a Sponsor paying for Dan's services.
The Managers wage being paid by an other.
Would it have made sense to have a similar arrangement to pay the rent?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 419
No.
It would have been sensible to have rent as the first thing paid every month before anything else.
That would have been sensible.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 529
Coming from you, that is high praise indeed ;-)
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: FAO danborofc
Views: 588
Two pairs of shoes and a coat.
I’ve nothing to hide.
UTB
Enjoy ya day.
Edited by danborofc at 14:02:30 on 10th March 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Previous thread: CLUB HISTORY BROUGHT RIGHT UP TO DATE by From Town To Town10/3 11:56Sun Mar 10 11:56:36 2024view thread