Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure
Views: 982
So just to re-cap, manager who came in pre-season without any "baggage" turned out to be untenable due to the "baggage" that came with him! Chairman gives temporary role to a bloke who actually did quite well and seemed to be getting a few results, Chairman then bins off bloke doing quite well for an "ex-pro" manager who chairman hoped would do better than temporary bloke. Ex-pro does even worse than temp bloke. In excess of 80 players rocked-up so far. CCL looking increasingly likely? What happened to 10 year plan? Wasn't there a consortium that took over the club from Mr Boon? Was there proper due diligence? Is there a justifiable legal case against the Thames Club? Is the Chairman a poorer version of Glenn Tamplin? Big ideas but not the means to deliver?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Arthur22/2/2020 10:10Sat Feb 22 10:10:29 2020
Martin Kuhl’s departure by Torquayrob21/2/2020 18:30Fri Feb 21 18:30:52 2020
1 personview thread- Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Surreysage21/2/2020 18:55Fri Feb 21 18:55:24 2020
- Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Swan21/2/2020 22:06Fri Feb 21 22:06:11 2020
- Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Arthur22/2/2020 10:10Sat Feb 22 10:10:29 2020
- Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Arthur22/2/2020 10:29Sat Feb 22 10:29:50 2020
- Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Rebel Yeller23/2/2020 16:00Sun Feb 23 16:00:59 2020
- Re: Martin Kuhl’s departure by Arthur21/2/2020 21:55Fri Feb 21 21:55:24 2020