Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Am I right in saying… by John Blair23/4 20:12Tue Apr 23 20:12:00 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Preparations for a new season by Arthur8/5/2020 10:01Fri May 8 10:01:40 2020view thread

Re: Result

By Arthur2/5/2020 08:49Sat May 2 08:49:44 2020In response to Re: Result

Views: 665

Manchester United players are taking legal advice over missed pay rises that would cost them up to a combined £50m if coronavirus means the season concludes. This quote is from todays papers. It really explains why football is in a cleft stick and not yet universally taking the only logical decision that has been made in our league to expunge results. Do you side with the players? Should they forgo contractual requirements. Yet from the clubs perspective, why should they pay increases if the season did not happen? This is also at a time when the club has lost its main income stream through the gate and from TV rights. They may also be suffering from diminishing sponsorship payments. It is all about the money, and not about what is best for the game. Play the games on neutral grounds? Why? is that fair. If a team has played more away games to this point in time. I really do think there is only one answer for football - but money talks. The higher the level in football the harder it is for people to realise that the game is more important than the money.

We are still not sure when football can restart at any level. Probably the most optimistic time is July or August. This then impinges on the following (2020/2021 season. It's not like the which came first, the chicken or the egg? Its which came first, the game or the money ...... Let's get some common sense.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Previous thread: Appearances for season 2019/20 (First Team and Youth Team) by swanstuff19/4/2020 22:04Sun Apr 19 22:04:09 2020view thread