Re: Arthur
Views: 988
Having been a supporter of the club since 1970 - and loyal home and away supporter for over 25 years of that - i don't think that anybody can dispute the level of money that Alan Boon put into the club in terms of the playing budget and pitch maintenance costs.
Alan was a very generous man who had the respect of a lot of people within the football fraternity.
Around the time of the 2007 and 2009 FA Cup runs it is no surprise that the club had one of the highest playing budgets at Step 3 level - a playing budget higher than a lot of Step 2 teams.
Alan thought nothing of dipping deeper into his pocket if he felt that it benefitted the club on the pitch. The joy on his face when we beat Stockport live on TV in November 2007 was a picture to savour and the party afterwards took some beating.
Whilst Alan loved the club the only question I would have is 'Why was the Freehold of the land sold to the Thames Club by Alan' . If this had not happened we would be the landlords rather than the tenants and wouldn't be suffering all the aggro that is currently going on with Downings/The Thames Club.
Matthew Boon became chairman/owner of STFC upon Alan's death but unfortunately didn't have the same level of enthusiasm shown by Alan and began to regard the club more as a business than an expensive hobby.
Personally I don't blame Matthew for this as more and more football clubs are now looked at as businesses rather than expensive hobbies for wealthy businessman.
However what I would like to say is that a lot of the clubs current problems are not down to the current ownership - although some people might choose to disagree !!
Joe Dixon did not sell the freehold of Wheatsheaf Park to the owners of the Thames Club.
This was down to Alan.
He also did not allow the Thames Club to :-
A) Reduce the size of the bar.
B) Take away the separate function room.
C) Remove the upstairs kitchen area and cellar room behind the bar.
D) Change the location of the clubs office and PA room.
These were all things that Matthew allowed to happen even though these were all areas stated in the lease as being for use by STFC rather than by the Thames Club.
People need to be aware of these facts before blaming the current ownership for everything that has gone wrong on or off the pitch.
And on another note 'boost the budget' schemes to assist with the playing budget are not something invented by STFC and the current ownership.
More and more non- league clubs run these and have been for a number of years.
Under the last 2 years of Matthew Boon's ownership the club were running a '12th Man Scheme' with supporters contributing towards the clubs running costs to take some of the financial pressure off of Matthew.
I know this for a fact as I was one of those contributing into it every month.
Edited by John Blair at 21:53:57 on 10th February 2021
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Next article in this thread: Re: Arthur by Surreysage11/2/2021 09:21Thu Feb 11 09:21:45 2021
- Arthur by Surreysage5/2/2021 09:42Fri Feb 5 09:42:29 2021view thread
- Re: Arthur by Arthur6/2/2021 09:09Sat Feb 6 09:09:22 2021
- Re: Arthur by gregs9/2/2021 13:39Tue Feb 9 13:39:21 2021
- Re: Arthur by Voicefromthepast7/2/2021 11:45Sun Feb 7 11:45:10 2021
- Re: Arthur by Arthur7/2/2021 14:13Sun Feb 7 14:13:53 2021
- Re: Arthur by Voicefromthepast9/2/2021 10:19Tue Feb 9 10:19:47 2021
- Re: Arthur by Arthur9/2/2021 22:28Tue Feb 9 22:28:47 2021
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage10/2/2021 09:52Wed Feb 10 09:52:46 2021 1 person
- Re: Arthur by gregs10/2/2021 15:51Wed Feb 10 15:51:28 2021
- Re: Arthur by John Blair10/2/2021 21:51Wed Feb 10 21:51:00 2021 1 person
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage11/2/2021 09:21Thu Feb 11 09:21:45 2021
- Re: Arthur by BigBadSwan11/2/2021 10:34Thu Feb 11 10:34:53 2021
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage11/2/2021 11:42Thu Feb 11 11:42:57 2021
- Re: Arthur by BigBadSwan11/2/2021 12:07Thu Feb 11 12:07:17 2021
- Re: Arthur by allen b11/2/2021 20:17Thu Feb 11 20:17:56 2021
- Re: Arthur by John Blair11/2/2021 21:19Thu Feb 11 21:19:29 2021
- Re: Arthur by Swan11/2/2021 21:55Thu Feb 11 21:55:34 2021
- Re: Arthur by southstreetswan11/2/2021 21:11Thu Feb 11 21:11:05 2021
- Re: Arthur by John Blair11/2/2021 21:28Thu Feb 11 21:28:14 2021
- Re: Arthur by southstreetswan11/2/2021 21:43Thu Feb 11 21:43:23 2021
- Re: Arthur by Arthur11/2/2021 22:09Thu Feb 11 22:09:34 2021
- Re: Arthur by southstreetswan11/2/2021 22:15Thu Feb 11 22:15:56 2021
- Re: Arthur by John Blair11/2/2021 22:09Thu Feb 11 22:09:34 2021
- Re: Arthur by southstreetswan11/2/2021 22:28Thu Feb 11 22:28:21 2021
- Re: Arthur by Arthur11/2/2021 22:53Thu Feb 11 22:53:59 2021
- Re: Arthur by southstreetswan12/2/2021 14:02Fri Feb 12 14:02:47 2021
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage12/2/2021 15:13Fri Feb 12 15:13:18 2021
- Re: Arthur by southstreetswan12/2/2021 15:27Fri Feb 12 15:27:35 2021
- Re: Arthur by BigBadSwan12/2/2021 15:48Fri Feb 12 15:48:15 2021 1 person
- Re: Arthur by Arthur12/2/2021 18:47Fri Feb 12 18:47:43 2021 1 person
- Re: Arthur by Voicefromthepast12/2/2021 11:10Fri Feb 12 11:10:52 2021
- Re: Arthur by BigBadSwan12/2/2021 11:26Fri Feb 12 11:26:23 2021
- Re: Arthur by Inspector Morse12/2/2021 09:38Fri Feb 12 09:38:04 2021 2 people
- Re: Arthur by Arthur12/2/2021 10:08Fri Feb 12 10:08:53 2021
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage11/2/2021 12:46Thu Feb 11 12:46:25 2021
- Re: Arthur by Arthur10/2/2021 22:41Wed Feb 10 22:41:42 2021
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage10/2/2021 14:40Wed Feb 10 14:40:55 2021
- Re: Arthur by Surreysage6/2/2021 09:36Sat Feb 6 09:36:57 2021