Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Am I right in saying… by John Blair23/4 20:12Tue Apr 23 20:12:00 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Saturday by Arthur15/9/2021 12:06Wed Sep 15 12:06:42 2021view thread

Re: oops

By Arthur13/9/2021 10:54Mon Sep 13 10:54:46 2021In response to Re: oops

Views: 660

I don't want to bore about water usage (142 litres per day for as single person, 528 litres for a 2 person household etc). Anyway, from work done (for the club regarding the freehold purchase, soon to be completed) the only possible use for the land is existing use. The council's current rules preclude developments in the borough's flood plain areas. Residential development will be a non-starter. Therefore investment should be to try and make a go of the gym and to invest in the football team. I am not sure the existing residents would appreciate the land becoming waste land. however, it seems the existing investors are finding the fact of flooding in the area in increasing measures hard to digest. Investment in the team and the gym is urgently required by people willing to see their investment grow at a slower rate than they originally thought. COYS

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Previous thread: Wraysbury Village v Reading YMCA at Wheatsheaf Park by John Blair10/9/2021 18:30Fri Sep 10 18:30:39 2021view thread