Re: A new low
Views: 1328
"Please just accept the gates will never be padlocked; there will always be football at Wheatsheaf Park."
I sincerely hope you're right, Arthur. However, that surely depends on the relationship between the club / its owner and the owners of Wheatsheaf Park?
As I think has been discussed before, Staines Town Football Club Limited is technically insolvent, given that it has negative "shareholders funds" of more than £180,000. There is a note in the accounts that the Director commits to providing the requisite financial support but the company via which the club is owned - Fulcrum Sports Investments - has filed accounts suggesting it is "dormant" and has a share capital of just £100. This begs the question: how will that support be forthcoming?
Let's assume that, without a playing budget, the club's matchday income is enough to cover the key bills - match officials, rent, utilities, etc - which at least ensures its short term viability. This should be enough, for now, to keep the gates open. But what happens when the club's current lease expires? Will the Thames Club / Dowling LLP grant it a new one and, if not, what then?
What happens if the club is asked to make good on the accumulated losses (c£180k) and is unable to do so? If it goes bust (God forbid) then you are right that there are good people who bleed royal blue and old gold and would surely form a 'phoenix' club. But would that club be able to use Wheatsheaf Park and, if not, where would it play? Ashford have a tenant, Spelthorne Sports have about four teams using their ground and Lammas only have the grading for Step 7. After that, the club's looking at going outside the borough and even the County; it has survived such arrangements before but, without financial support, could it do so again?
If you cut me, I'd bleed tangerine and white but even as an exiled Ashfordian, I can only feel sadness about last night's result. STFC obviously has deep-rooted problems but I hope they can be resolved. It will take a long time to do that, though.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Next article in this thread: Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 14:23Wed Jan 12 14:23:07 2022
- A new low by swanvesta12/1/2022 05:17Wed Jan 12 05:17:49 2022view thread
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:31Wed Jan 12 11:31:52 2022
- Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 12:00Wed Jan 12 12:00:59 2022 1 person
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 14:23Wed Jan 12 14:23:07 2022
- Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 15:01Wed Jan 12 15:01:52 2022 1 person
- Re: A new low by Surreysage12/1/2022 14:50Wed Jan 12 14:50:04 2022
- Re: A new low by gregs12/1/2022 17:45Wed Jan 12 17:45:25 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:42Wed Jan 12 20:42:08 2022
- Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 10:29Thu Jan 13 10:29:13 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:48Thu Jan 13 10:48:38 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:54Wed Jan 12 20:54:08 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:00Wed Jan 12 21:00:38 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:04Wed Jan 12 21:04:14 2022
- Re: A new low by Swandico13/1/2022 10:14Thu Jan 13 10:14:02 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:28Thu Jan 13 10:28:35 2022
- Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 12:29Thu Jan 13 12:29:56 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 19:34Thu Jan 13 19:34:29 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 21:12Thu Jan 13 21:12:10 2022
- Re: A new low by lampshade8813/1/2022 11:08Thu Jan 13 11:08:31 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 11:58Thu Jan 13 11:58:14 2022
- Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 12:09Fri Jan 14 12:09:37 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 12:46Fri Jan 14 12:46:46 2022
- Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 17:02Fri Jan 14 17:02:17 2022
- Re: A new low by Surreysage14/1/2022 14:31Fri Jan 14 14:31:15 2022
- Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 15:28Fri Jan 14 15:28:44 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 15:56Fri Jan 14 15:56:49 2022
- Re: A new low by Gareth Coates14/1/2022 17:32Fri Jan 14 17:32:51 2022
- Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 16:18Fri Jan 14 16:18:59 2022
- Re: A new low by swanvesta14/1/2022 16:27Fri Jan 14 16:27:37 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 22:54Fri Jan 14 22:54:14 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:40Wed Jan 12 11:40:02 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:49Wed Jan 12 11:49:30 2022
- Re: A new low by scouser12/1/2022 11:20Wed Jan 12 11:20:09 2022