Re: A new low
Views: 1112
Thankyou for the summary Arthur-but I do think all this with the Thames club is a smokescreen to cover why Joe-a property developer- purchased the club in the first place
Pardon me for not understanding- but if you decide to buy a football club surely having a competative team on the pitch is normally the priority . Getting involved in the internal financial structure of your landlords and its associated backers is not the normal activity of a non league football club.Better to have the club surviving by playing at a different venue than being pushed out of business by debts incurred in fighting your landlord.Walton & Hersham have increased attendance fronm around 60 per game to over 400+since ground sharing at the Walton hub.
From my viewpoint (without the full details you have from Joe) investigations were carried out by Joe as he wished to purchase the freehold in his personal capacity and therefore any connected legal costs should be his sole responsibility and not channelled through the football club. If the huge deficit highlighted by Gareth in the football club accounts relates to legal costs I think supporters have aright to be provided with a full explanation especially in view of the supporters contributionsto the playing budget. .
Edited by Norm at 10:32:51 on 13th January 2022
Edited by Norm at 10:35:28 on 13th January 2022
Edited by Norm at 10:38:52 on 13th January 2022
Edited by Norm at 10:39:56 on 13th January 2022
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:48Thu Jan 13 10:48:38 2022
- A new low by swanvesta12/1/2022 05:17Wed Jan 12 05:17:49 2022view thread
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:31Wed Jan 12 11:31:52 2022
- Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 12:00Wed Jan 12 12:00:59 2022 1 person
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 14:23Wed Jan 12 14:23:07 2022
- Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 15:01Wed Jan 12 15:01:52 2022 1 person
- Re: A new low by Surreysage12/1/2022 14:50Wed Jan 12 14:50:04 2022
- Re: A new low by gregs12/1/2022 17:45Wed Jan 12 17:45:25 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:42Wed Jan 12 20:42:08 2022
- Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 10:29Thu Jan 13 10:29:13 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:48Thu Jan 13 10:48:38 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:54Wed Jan 12 20:54:08 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:00Wed Jan 12 21:00:38 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:04Wed Jan 12 21:04:14 2022
- Re: A new low by Swandico13/1/2022 10:14Thu Jan 13 10:14:02 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:28Thu Jan 13 10:28:35 2022
- Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 12:29Thu Jan 13 12:29:56 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 19:34Thu Jan 13 19:34:29 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 21:12Thu Jan 13 21:12:10 2022
- Re: A new low by lampshade8813/1/2022 11:08Thu Jan 13 11:08:31 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 11:58Thu Jan 13 11:58:14 2022
- Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 12:09Fri Jan 14 12:09:37 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 12:46Fri Jan 14 12:46:46 2022
- Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 17:02Fri Jan 14 17:02:17 2022
- Re: A new low by Surreysage14/1/2022 14:31Fri Jan 14 14:31:15 2022
- Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 15:28Fri Jan 14 15:28:44 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 15:56Fri Jan 14 15:56:49 2022
- Re: A new low by Gareth Coates14/1/2022 17:32Fri Jan 14 17:32:51 2022
- Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 16:18Fri Jan 14 16:18:59 2022
- Re: A new low by swanvesta14/1/2022 16:27Fri Jan 14 16:27:37 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 22:54Fri Jan 14 22:54:14 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:40Wed Jan 12 11:40:02 2022
- Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:49Wed Jan 12 11:49:30 2022
- Re: A new low by scouser12/1/2022 11:20Wed Jan 12 11:20:09 2022