Return to front page

Newest article: Re: FA Vase 2024/25 season by John Blair20/9 19:56Fri Sep 20 19:56:25 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: oops"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: oops

By Arthur13/9/2021 10:54Mon Sep 13 10:54:46 2021In response to Re: oops

Views: 733

I don't want to bore about water usage (142 litres per day for as single person, 528 litres for a 2 person household etc). Anyway, from work done (for the club regarding the freehold purchase, soon to be completed) the only possible use for the land is existing use. The council's current rules preclude developments in the borough's flood plain areas. Residential development will be a non-starter. Therefore investment should be to try and make a go of the gym and to invest in the football team. I am not sure the existing residents would appreciate the land becoming waste land. however, it seems the existing investors are finding the fact of flooding in the area in increasing measures hard to digest. Investment in the team and the gym is urgently required by people willing to see their investment grow at a slower rate than they originally thought. COYS

  • Collapse threadoops by Arthur12/9/2021 09:17Sun Sep 12 09:17:16 2021view thread
  • Re: oops by Yellow Swan12/9/2021 15:14Sun Sep 12 15:14:23 2021
  • Re: oops by Arthur12/9/2021 22:25Sun Sep 12 22:25:36 2021
  • Re: oops by gregs13/9/2021 07:48Mon Sep 13 07:48:35 2021
  • Re: oops by Arthur13/9/2021 10:54Mon Sep 13 10:54:46 2021