Return to front page

Newest article: Re: FA Vase 2024/25 season by John Blair20/9 19:56Fri Sep 20 19:56:25 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Saturday"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Saturday

By Arthur16/9/2021 07:40Thu Sep 16 07:40:49 2021In response to Re: Saturday

Views: 783

The Thames Club are not the problem. They own the land it is true. However they have never had a profitable year and had to undergo a significant refinancing five or six years ago. It is the business that controls the Thames Club that is the problem. They have a lot of money ....... However I do believe Joe when he says he has made a very fair bid to buy back the freehold for the land under existing use (football ground and gym). I think the owners see the land as a prime development site. There is no arguing that this would have been true in the middle of th e last decade. Today we can see the increasing effects of global warming. The ground is in an area very susceptible to flooding with increasing regularity . The council have had to place very strict criteria on any proposed developments in the flood plain. I am not sure that residential development on the land is permissible, which means the land will have to be sold, if it is sold, for existing use. It is now a game of poker between Joe and the Thames Club backers which will determine the ultimate destiny of the football club. I believe that if the team is successful on the pitch and bringing in crowds of support reflecting that success then joe's hand in the poker game would be very much strengthened. If it is a team just above park level football followed by a handful of loyal supporters always reflecting on the good old days, there is a strong possibility we may be reflecting in our armchairs or in the Wheatsheaf and Pidegeon.

  • Collapse threadSaturday by Arthur15/9/2021 12:06Wed Sep 15 12:06:42 2021view thread
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes15/9/2021 16:42Wed Sep 15 16:42:04 20211 person dislikes this 1 person
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur15/9/2021 20:17Wed Sep 15 20:17:04 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes15/9/2021 21:30Wed Sep 15 21:30:25 20211 person dislikes this 1 person
  • Re: Saturday by southstreetswan15/9/2021 22:18Wed Sep 15 22:18:24 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes15/9/2021 23:03Wed Sep 15 23:03:30 20211 person dislikes this 1 person
  • Re: Saturday by southstreetswan15/9/2021 23:12Wed Sep 15 23:12:10 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur16/9/2021 07:40Thu Sep 16 07:40:49 20211 person dislikes this 1 person
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes16/9/2021 14:04Thu Sep 16 14:04:04 20212 people dislike this 2 people
  • Re: Saturday by southstreetswan16/9/2021 18:07Thu Sep 16 18:07:21 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur16/9/2021 20:25Thu Sep 16 20:25:08 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes17/9/2021 00:44Fri Sep 17 00:44:42 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur17/9/2021 09:23Fri Sep 17 09:23:44 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes17/9/2021 10:05Fri Sep 17 10:05:40 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Stainesloyal17/9/2021 10:30Fri Sep 17 10:30:19 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur17/9/2021 10:44Fri Sep 17 10:44:34 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Stainesloyal17/9/2021 11:43Fri Sep 17 11:43:41 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur17/9/2021 14:25Fri Sep 17 14:25:02 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Stainesloyal17/9/2021 16:15Fri Sep 17 16:15:31 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur17/9/2021 17:17Fri Sep 17 17:17:11 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur17/9/2021 10:28Fri Sep 17 10:28:06 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes17/9/2021 11:03Fri Sep 17 11:03:18 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Arthur17/9/2021 17:14Fri Sep 17 17:14:30 2021
  • Re: Saturday by Wakes17/9/2021 18:22Fri Sep 17 18:22:30 2021