Return to front page

Newest article: Re: FA Vase 2024/25 season by John Blair20/9 19:56Fri Sep 20 19:56:25 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: A new low"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: A new low

By Gareth Coates (beano)12/1/2022 15:01Wed Jan 12 15:01:52 2022In response to Re: A new low

Views: 1251

There were no controversial assumptions on my part, Arthur. Just one about income, which was pretty conservative.

There were plenty of questions for sure, because I see scorelines like last night's and I struggle to wrap my head around them. Because I live near Liverpool these days I don't have as nuanced an understanding of the football scene in my old neck of the woods as I once did.

I saw that result and it made me sad. It also made me wonder how such a situation could be remedied, given that the owner of the club has delegated responsibility for running it to others. There are both short-term and long-term challenges that face Staines Town but surely the key to it all is Wheatsheaf Park. If the freeholders do not wish to sell (and it is evident they don't) then the club's priority should be ensuring they have the facilities they need to be viable for years to come. To do that, a deal needs to be done with the Thames Club or its owners, one way or another.

Edited by beano at 15:04:10 on 12th January 2022

  • Collapse threadA new low by swanvesta12/1/2022 05:17Wed Jan 12 05:17:49 2022view thread
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:31Wed Jan 12 11:31:52 2022
  • Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 12:00Wed Jan 12 12:00:59 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 14:23Wed Jan 12 14:23:07 2022
  • Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 15:01Wed Jan 12 15:01:52 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage12/1/2022 14:50Wed Jan 12 14:50:04 2022
  • Re: A new low by gregs12/1/2022 17:45Wed Jan 12 17:45:25 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:42Wed Jan 12 20:42:08 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 10:29Thu Jan 13 10:29:13 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:48Thu Jan 13 10:48:38 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:54Wed Jan 12 20:54:08 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:00Wed Jan 12 21:00:38 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:04Wed Jan 12 21:04:14 2022
  • Re: A new low by Swandico13/1/2022 10:14Thu Jan 13 10:14:02 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:28Thu Jan 13 10:28:35 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 12:29Thu Jan 13 12:29:56 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 19:34Thu Jan 13 19:34:29 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 21:12Thu Jan 13 21:12:10 2022
  • Re: A new low by lampshade8813/1/2022 11:08Thu Jan 13 11:08:31 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 11:58Thu Jan 13 11:58:14 2022
  • Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 12:09Fri Jan 14 12:09:37 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 12:46Fri Jan 14 12:46:46 2022
  • Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 17:02Fri Jan 14 17:02:17 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage14/1/2022 14:31Fri Jan 14 14:31:15 2022
  • Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 15:28Fri Jan 14 15:28:44 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 15:56Fri Jan 14 15:56:49 2022
  • Re: A new low by Gareth Coates14/1/2022 17:32Fri Jan 14 17:32:51 2022
  • Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 16:18Fri Jan 14 16:18:59 2022
  • Re: A new low by swanvesta14/1/2022 16:27Fri Jan 14 16:27:37 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 22:54Fri Jan 14 22:54:14 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:40Wed Jan 12 11:40:02 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:49Wed Jan 12 11:49:30 2022
  • Re: A new low by scouser12/1/2022 11:20Wed Jan 12 11:20:09 2022