Return to front page

Newest article: Vacancies - Goalkeeper Coach & Physio by FlyingPiglet11/6 23:21Tue Jun 11 23:21:13 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: A new low"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: A new low

By Arthur12/1/2022 20:42Wed Jan 12 20:42:08 2022In response to Re: A new low

Views: 1167

This does get rather wearing. Up util David Norris pleaded with me to watch Joe's videos on the Thames Club and D0ownings, I was one of his biggest critics. Those videos led me to some 18 months work to produce a paper sent to FRC, FRRP, ICAEW, ACCA, Business Minister and his shadow. It was copied to Joe (C/O Wheatsheaf Park, the football club, the supporters club, The Thames Club and Downings, Essentially 96% of the Thames Club share capital is owned by one company - a dormant non-trading company. This means that without the exercise of those votes the Thames Club cannot pass any resolution. The voting control is said to be Down wings, although they say they limit their votes to 50%. This would still make the 'thames Club an associate undertaking of Downings. Downings say they have no subsidiaries nor associates. The paper covered a number of other issues and has yet to be decided on one or the other . Joe phoned me (he got my number from the club) to thank me for my efforts. I pointed out the investment needed for the team and he promised that when the legal issues are fully resolved, that money will be channelled into the club. The information I got was all in the public domain and anyone could, if prepared to put in the effort, got the same thanks.

  • Collapse threadA new low by swanvesta12/1/2022 05:17Wed Jan 12 05:17:49 2022view thread
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:31Wed Jan 12 11:31:52 2022
  • Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 12:00Wed Jan 12 12:00:59 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 14:23Wed Jan 12 14:23:07 2022
  • Re: A new low by Gareth Coates12/1/2022 15:01Wed Jan 12 15:01:52 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage12/1/2022 14:50Wed Jan 12 14:50:04 2022
  • Re: A new low by gregs12/1/2022 17:45Wed Jan 12 17:45:25 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:42Wed Jan 12 20:42:08 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 10:29Thu Jan 13 10:29:13 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:48Thu Jan 13 10:48:38 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 20:54Wed Jan 12 20:54:08 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:00Wed Jan 12 21:00:38 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 21:04Wed Jan 12 21:04:14 2022
  • Re: A new low by Swandico13/1/2022 10:14Thu Jan 13 10:14:02 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 10:28Thu Jan 13 10:28:35 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage13/1/2022 12:29Thu Jan 13 12:29:56 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 19:34Thu Jan 13 19:34:29 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 21:12Thu Jan 13 21:12:10 2022
  • Re: A new low by lampshade8813/1/2022 11:08Thu Jan 13 11:08:31 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur13/1/2022 11:58Thu Jan 13 11:58:14 2022
  • Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 12:09Fri Jan 14 12:09:37 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 12:46Fri Jan 14 12:46:46 2022
  • Re: A new low by gregs14/1/2022 17:02Fri Jan 14 17:02:17 2022
  • Re: A new low by Surreysage14/1/2022 14:31Fri Jan 14 14:31:15 2022
  • Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 15:28Fri Jan 14 15:28:44 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 15:56Fri Jan 14 15:56:49 2022
  • Re: A new low by Gareth Coates14/1/2022 17:32Fri Jan 14 17:32:51 2022
  • Re: A new low by Swandico14/1/2022 16:18Fri Jan 14 16:18:59 2022
  • Re: A new low by swanvesta14/1/2022 16:27Fri Jan 14 16:27:37 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur14/1/2022 22:54Fri Jan 14 22:54:14 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:40Wed Jan 12 11:40:02 2022
  • Re: A new low by Arthur12/1/2022 11:49Wed Jan 12 11:49:30 2022
  • Re: A new low by scouser12/1/2022 11:20Wed Jan 12 11:20:09 2022