Return to front page

Newest article: S&L(M)FC - Pre-season Friendlies for the 2024/25 C… by FlyingPiglet12/5 07:28Sun May 12 07:28:12 2024view thread

Oldest article: ''ships in the night '' by Andrew6726/2/2014 10:25Wed Feb 26 10:25:34 2014view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Saturday by Arthur15/9/2021 12:06Wed Sep 15 12:06:42 2021view thread

oops

By Arthur12/9/2021 09:17Sun Sep 12 09:17:16 2021

Views: 738

The Isthmian league awarded Ashford Town the performance of the month award. Yesterday they lost at home to Sutton common ....... Seems like awards need to be given for success ...... Ooops

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: oops

By Yellow Swan (pp7822)12/9/2021 15:14Sun Sep 12 15:14:23 2021In response to oopsTop of thread

Views: 809

I think we need to worry about ourselves to be honest! Bottom of the league, haven’t won a game all season and shipped in 10 goals in two games with fans not voicing much concern whatsoever. Our club is heading towards another relegation and another dreadful season of heavy defeats every game….

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: oops

By Arthur12/9/2021 22:25Sun Sep 12 22:25:36 2021In response to Re: oopsTop of thread

Views: 706

that really is the point. The players wehasver are not capable of playing at the level of competition the club has registered to play. in order to compete we need to drop two levels. this would reduce income from gates etc. it is up to the club to decide. if they want to play at this level the player funding needs to match that desire. the facilities and cub volunteers are suited to Isthmian league, or even National South football. The funding by the club is at a staines Lamas level of football.

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: oops

By gregs13/9/2021 07:48Mon Sep 13 07:48:35 2021In response to Re: oopsTop of thread

Views: 648

Is it true that the players aren't actually being paid? Heard a lot about that on Twitter. Can't expect much at all if this is the case and also asks the question where is Joe Dixon in all of this? Seems he can table a multi million pound bid to the Thames Club but unable to cover a wage bill.....

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Re: oops

By Arthur13/9/2021 10:54Mon Sep 13 10:54:46 2021In response to Re: oopsTop of thread

Views: 665

I don't want to bore about water usage (142 litres per day for as single person, 528 litres for a 2 person household etc). Anyway, from work done (for the club regarding the freehold purchase, soon to be completed) the only possible use for the land is existing use. The council's current rules preclude developments in the borough's flood plain areas. Residential development will be a non-starter. Therefore investment should be to try and make a go of the gym and to invest in the football team. I am not sure the existing residents would appreciate the land becoming waste land. however, it seems the existing investors are finding the fact of flooding in the area in increasing measures hard to digest. Investment in the team and the gym is urgently required by people willing to see their investment grow at a slower rate than they originally thought. COYS

reply to this article | return to the front page

   

Previous thread: Wraysbury Village v Reading YMCA at Wheatsheaf Park by John Blair10/9/2021 18:30Fri Sep 10 18:30:39 2021view thread